The Associated Locksmiths of America or should I say, ALOA Security Professionals Association since they have removed the word "locksmith" from their image are now proposing to petition the Federal Trade Commission to consider certain acts by a locksmith to be deemed "criminal" activity.
The irony of this is that it is intended to be the silver bullet that curbs all scammer activity and consumer ripoffs which are not conducted by the locksmith community, but by individuals "posing" as locksmiths. For some reason in my view, this association's leadership continues to be obsessed with government regulations, licenses and rules, and the more they are rejected the more desperate their efforts become.
In a recent ABC News article, hardworking honorable mobile locksmiths found themselves betrayed and abandoned while consumers were being told to only pick a lock shop or retail storefront for service which makes all mobile locksmiths look like criminals. It also presented recommendations like not to pay cash for a service and that any trained locksmith can open "any" lock, which any true professional knows is not accurate or honest. When these types of articles are presented to the general public they are crafted from talking points obtained by those wishing to drive the agenda of licensing which leads to the restriction of trade.
Locksmith Bryan Patricks posted in a LinkedIn discussion that he did his research and contacted ABC News KSTP and when he asked where the news station got their information from, he was told the following - "Your locksmith association and editorial outlets."
Bryan Patricks also stated that he discovered the news article was shared on the Locksmith Ledger (a locksmith magazine and editorial content) social media page. When he posted an observation and objection to the fact that the consumers were being directed only to retail storefront operations or lock shops, and that several of the consumer tips were misleading and inappropriate - his post was deleted!
Eventually, someone from the Locksmith Ledger did admit in the same LinkedIn discussion that licensing is not working, but we never seem to see any editorials saying so or reporting on the position of those opposed to it. Not one article was ever run to reflect the deception discovered in Florida by the Locksmith Investigator (Accurate Answers? Parts 1, 2 & 3 - Neglected facts and mis-characterizations lead to wrong conclusions). So what's really going on?
In another locksmith magazine with editorial content dated April 2013 called The National Locksmith, publisher Marc Goldberg admits his participation and others in manufacturing and distribution engaged in the effort to rename the "locksmiths" because it is "too old". He further states that the new identity of this long respected craft, (which dates as far back as the Egyptians by the way!) will now be identified as "Security Professionals" and to make the public aware of it.
Goldberg's revelations also hint that when it came to spending money to a public relations firm (which would cost thousands of dollars) to reach the general public to raise awareness, that he didn't know how it all was left off, and then came the "scammers". He then discusses how if you Google Locksmiths you will find lots of articles, news reports and government websites advising the public to find a LEGITIMATE LOCKSMITH (code word). And they even tell you how to find one or as they think you find one.
He closes his remarks with the following statement -
"In the end, we couldn't hope to buy the sort of publicity we as an industry are now getting for free." He thanks the scammers and says - "we couldn't have done it without you."
What Goldberg does not tell you is how all the free publicity is negative and harming the industry! There has been and there is in my opinion an "intentional" effort to defame the locksmiths in order to elevate the new "goal" or agendas of a cabal, who claims it is in the interest of the industry. However, the mobile operators and the Mom & Pops seem to be forgotten in this new goal and only storefronts or retail shops are being considered. Mobile locksmiths are not illegitimate and comprise 80% of the industry!
To further throw salt on the wounds of the industry, we find in in the May 2013 issue of the National Locksmith magazine, Editor Greg Mango sharing a letter he received about a news article which was written 1 year ago on June 8, 2012 by Sid Kircheimer for the AARP.
The sender of the letter to the Editor is concerned about how the article is misleading and he/she describes how impossible it was to communicate with the AARP or the author to set things straight. The TNL Editor goes on to say that "knowing the source of the information or misinformation, affords you the opportunity to address the issue and alleviate any concerns". He further states in his editorial - "It is not so much that the information given by the AARP was incorrect, it's more the manner in which it was presented. The AARP article was intended to help the legitimate locksmiths and shine a light about the scammers to its members."
I personally spoke with Sid Kircheimer immediately after the articles release and he was very pleasant and relayed the same "source of information" that Bryan Patricks recently discovered in the ABC news article and he also cited his source in his article, one of which was ALOA. This AARP story was being heatedly discussed in industry social media groups such as LinkedIn, Facebook, and industry forums etc. And why is it that the same misleading talking points are being regurgitated now one year later if it was simply an incorrect presentation? When I contacted the source of the AARP article. I was told that they were misquoted by Sid Kircheimer. However, there was no attempt to correct it. My conversation with Sid did not indicate there was any misquoting going on. So again I ask, what's really going on?
Why is it that these "misquotes" seem to be occurring exactly the same 1 year later? I personally do not believe they are misquotes because if they were, they would not continually appear!
The information in the AARP and now the ABC KSTP News story IS! The manner in which it was presented WAS intended to be incorrect or it would have been corrected. Here we are once again hearing how this was "intended" to help the "legitimate" locksmiths and "shine a light" on the scammers. The "source of the information" was addressed a year ago and yet this continues?
In summary, if the news reports are getting their information from inside our industry and it is being presented incorrectly while intending to help the "legitimate" (which is code for retail storefront operations) as they "shine a light" (which is code for FREE negative publicity) on the scammers (which is code for anyone who cannot pick every lock or whatever other incorrect reasoning), then there is a problem. A real BIG problem.
Whew!! Sounds like a story for Alex Jones!
The excuse of the scammers is being bastardized in my opinion while the media is being used as a tool of misinformation and disinformation for the purpose of hype. Each news story becomes more and more obvious with the true purpose of the reports - which is to facilitate government regulation and licensing which is the "old" goals. It appears our own industry trade magazines are not interested in providing fair and balanced media coverage of the shenanigans.
When you examine the news media coverage, official and unofficial documentation, email communications, social media chatter and trade editorials a picture emerges and it is alarming in my opinion. So what's really going on?
The hardworking locksmiths are not doing anything wrong and never asked to have their reputations or livelihoods scuttled to achieve a goal of a few who wish to control the many.
When you compare the ABC News article, to the behavior of censorship of the alternative opinions and the "new goal" to ALOA's proposal to make certain locksmith acts criminal as seen below, it becomes painfully obvious that what Bryan Patricks was told by the reporter at ABC KSTP news, is not only right - but damning.
Below is the actual proposal to the Federal Trade Commission by ALOA Security Professionals to criminalize certain acts of the locksmith profession. What is disturbing is that one of the things they seek to criminalize is something they advocate, teach and train, which is drilling a lock. Throughout the locksmith industry, drilling a lock for the purpose of bypassing is a technique taught to everyone through every school, local association and correspondence course.
To claim in a news story to the AARP, ABC (other media) and to the general public the notion that any locksmith who cannot "pick open" every or most locks and those who cannot should be dismissed or considered a scammer is irresponsible in my opinion. To attempt to drive consumers away form the hard working mobile operators is also irresponsible in my view and I question why any one of them would support those doing this. Lastly, to attempt to "price fix" by making it a criminal act for a locksmith to charge what the free market system gives him/her the freedom to do, is grossly criminal itself!
On every United States dollar bill (and others) it states - "The following is legal tender for all debts, public and private". After reading the proposal below, it would be an illegal act to ask for this cash, but only if you are a locksmith!
I publicly challenged ALOA leadership and staff to pick any lock of my choosing, at any location, at any time day or night, under any condition and do so within a reasonable amount of time (which is 5 minutes among professionals!) The Society of Professional Locksmiths offered to donate $1000 to their scholarship fund if they could.
Not one person from this organization leadership stepped up to meet this challenge. The reason in my opinion is that these talking points to the media and lawmakers are a false narrative.
Please stop defaming the hard working locksmiths and start defining the scammers and the issues properly, and if these news sources are getting the wrong information as claimed - why can't it be corrected?
Proposed Addition to C.F.R Title 16: Commercial Practices: Rules Applicable to Locksmiths
It is an unfair act or practice for a locksmith to:
1) Break, pry, drill, or otherwise damage or destroy a lock or other security device where industry standards dictate that such an opening should be performed by picking or otherwise performing the opening in such a manor as to avoid causing damage.
2) Cause damage to an entryway, locking device, window, or other property not in accordance with industry standards.
3) Require that payment be in cash only.
4) To charge more than 50% higher total charge industry standards for that local dictate when on a service call.
5) Misrepresent arrival time to a service call by more than 30 minutes. Such misrepresentation may be considered criminal if habitual, fraudulent, and or committed between the hours of 9:00 PM and 7:00AM.
Violation of other sections of this title shall constitute a criminal act.
ALOA should make these rules only apply to its membership. If they break the rules then their "kicked out". Then maybe eventually the real locksmiths will no longer be a part of ALOA. They don't represent the majority of Locksmiths now. Why should they be allowed to represent us?
ALOA has been trying to control my business since I started almost two decades ago. We have an ongoing grooming through media manipulation as a result of desperation. As long as locksmiths in business continue to operate with integrity, honesty, and provide our customers with the services expected when contacted, our worried controllers will be left behind and their arrogant, ignorant, and demeaning words of fear and reactive business practices will be transparent to our customers.
Deeply disturbing that this dialog is even taking place immediately comes to mind. The infighting is not productive. The finger-pointing is really wasted effort. Invoke the FIDO Factor-Forget It Drive On is my recommendation. No more Group Gropes. There is no possible compromise. Whomever developed the notion the only legitimate locksmiths are those with a storefront are making a broad statement without respecting the many who have indeed made fortunes sans brick and mortar. To suggest all store owners are all fine folks with top shelf business practices is really silly. How interesting those pushing for brick and mortar seem to be the same complaining about the growing throng of consumers that click and order, albeit another subject. So, what to do? Take matters locally. Business Owners must promote their own businesses, using the Internet-the real equalizer. Consumers are looking for the local merchant on the internet nearly 97% of the time. Spend your energy and invest your hard earned dollars not defending your position and scaring people with who not to call but promoting your business so you will be found. Tell people why you, why your company and what they can expect from you. Publish testimonials from happy customers on your web sites and in your social media. They are far greater an endorsement than any logo, emblem or badge. Promoting as a group to the masses to shop at your business will not grow your business and actually may restrict it. Promote yourself. Promote your business. Do it today. Not sure where to begin? Contact me.
Bob don't get roped in by the misinformation put out by ALOA regarding the size of their membership. The numbers given are not realistic. They have been floating larger numbers for years but this was debunked. There is still misleading numbers posted on their website. It is inappropriate to do it, but you have to know who your dealing with. Check their directory and you find it is more about institutional locksmiths and not the entrepreneur. This is one of the problems.
Tom, I resent your implication that ALOA represents the institutional locksmiths instead of commercial locksmiths. The ILA represents institutional locksmiths. ALOA is attempting to encroach on that market because they were unsuccessful in their takeover attempt of the ILA. I do not know exactly who ALOA represents (although I am a life member of both ALOA and ILA) but the main institutional references they have seem to me to be from their alliance with Lockmasters, which brought them governmental employees.
Your resentment is fine Don. My day is not ruined by it. I resent what you have done and said to help create the problems. I have made my decision to respect the independent entrepreneur. Please respect that.
It's uncanny that thirty or so years ago when I received my CML from ALOA, it made me proud to be recognized as someone in my industry that one can look up to for guidance and honesty in solving their lock problem issues. Now ALOA seems to be saying that a CML rating is not worth the paper it's printed on if you are a mobil locksmith. They should be ashamed of themselves. I worked very hard to reach that level of expertise, and now I feel they have betrayed me.
Don, I hear your message in between the lines. I know you well enough to get the deeper signals being sent by you. So, I will apologize for my inference that ALOA represents the institutional locksmiths.
I joined the ALOA back in 1978 as a fairly new locksmith. I could not afford to attend classes as I was also working for GM.
I joined ALOA after I started out on my own, as a 3d generation locksmith, I took the advice of my father on this. I dropped my membership shortly thereafter. The classes I took were teaching that some of my methods were just plain wrong, when they were in fact faster and produced noticeably more accurate results. Next they began to hold their conventions in Las Vegas, apologies to my Nevada brethren, but that is just not the enviroment I wish to take my family into. Again, I am a THIRD generation locksmith, I have been learning this trade since the age of 12, I also (on my father's advice) went to school, and earned certification. ALOA tells me that since I did not take their tests, pay them money nor travel a few hundred miles to their testing location, then I am not a master at my tradecraft. Tell that to the 3 guys fellow locksmiths sent me to train for them or the other 2 apprentices I trained who now have their own thriving businesses. Next I began reading the spew ALOA has been publishing about how to spot the scammer, they pretty much described myself and 90% of the 'legit' guys here in this market.(except for the lying and stealing parts) My father never had a marked vehicle or a uniform, I wear a uniform but no longer have a van. Thank you scammers that I can no longer afford to keep one running. One guy around here has a very nice service van but uses another shop's address since he doesn't have a shop, guys putting their number on the family car etc etc. All good and honest people with morals and integrity. NOT scammers. I have spent 36 years in this trade, taught clinics for the Home Depot, trained up and coming locksmiths, consulted with a lock manufacturer, I am greeted at the store and known in my community. But according to ALOA? I think they are pressing this legislation, not for the locksmith, but to force people to join ALOA to fill up their coffers. Just think, every penny you give to them just means more money for lobbying activities. Folks, I am so done with them. You want classes? Make friends with other locksmiths in your community. There is nothing we like better than to impart our knowledge. See if your supplier is sponsoring classes, check the websites of manufacturers. If ALOA isn't helping you, and you need to look into this and make your own decision, stop helping them.
What ALOA should do a census on the existing scammer crook fake locksmiths names that are doing the work.
ALOA, is misleading the public and the few honest locksmith members in their data bank about the truth about the "Nationwide Locksmith Scam". ALOA data bank for its members it's outdated. There is no way to verify or match their licensed locksmith members or addresses.
ALOA is misinforming it's members and the public. Their data bank of licensed locksmith is outdated.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.